No-Code Automation Builder for HR

No-Code Automation Builder for HR

No-Code Automation Builder for HR

In the early 2022, I co-founded Introist with three other co-founders, a SaaS designed to empower HR departments by enabling them to create their own automation processes without the need for extensive IT projects.

Our aim was to automate simple and repetitive tasks that did not require human creative decision-making within people processes (e.g., onboarding, offboarding, relocation, etc.).

This case study explores the development of Introist, with a particular focus on its core feature - Workflow Builder.

In the early 2022, I co-founded Introist with three other co-founders, a SaaS designed to empower HR departments by enabling them to create their own automation processes without the need for extensive IT projects.

Our aim was to automate simple and repetitive tasks that did not require human creative decision-making within people processes (e.g., onboarding, offboarding, relocation, etc.).

This case study explores the development of Introist, with a particular focus on its core feature - Workflow Builder.

In the early 2022, I co-founded Introist with three other co-founders, a SaaS designed to empower HR departments by enabling them to create their own automation processes without the need for extensive IT projects.

Our aim was to automate simple and repetitive tasks that did not require human creative decision-making within people processes (e.g., onboarding, offboarding, relocation, etc.).

This case study explores the development of Introist, with a particular focus on its core feature - Workflow Builder.

My role

Product Design

Research

My role

Product Design

Research

My role

Product Design

Research

Team

Klaus Julin - Software Engineer

Jarno Vuorenmaa - Software Engineer

Sara Suviranta - Software Engineer

Team

Klaus Julin - Software Engineer

Jarno Vuorenmaa - Software Engineer

Sara Suviranta - Software Engineer

Team

Klaus Julin - Software Engineer

Jarno Vuorenmaa - Software Engineer

Sara Suviranta - Software Engineer

Year

2022

Year

2022

Year

2022

Company

Introist

Company

Introist

Company

Introist

Insights from our workplaces

Insights from our workplaces

HR departments are spending a significant amount of time on simple and repetitive tasks as part of people processes

HR departments are spending a significant amount of time on simple and repetitive tasks as part of people processes

Send welcome message

7 days before start

Order keys from reception

3 days before start

Book first week feedback session

On start date

Book Cybersecurity training

3 days before start

Send offer letter

When signed

Send tool ordering form

14 days before start

Collect tax information

7 days before start

Invite to Global Onboarding Day

1 day before start

Book orientation meeting - Sales

3 days before start

Prepare work station

7 days before start

Introduce new joiner to #general

On start date

Send first week's agenda

3 days before start

Send first week's agenda

3 days before start

Send first week's agenda

3 days before start

Book 1-3-6 checks

On start date

Invite to Friday Breakfast

3 days before start

Book 1-on-1 with CEO

On start date

Prepare work station

7 days before start

Assign Buddy to new joiner

14 days before start

Assign Buddy to new joiner

14 days before start

Assign Buddy to new joiner

14 days before start

Order access key from Spaces

7 days before start

Order access key from Spaces

7 days before start

Get suitable company merch

On start date

Discovery

To understand the problem better, I had a chance to look at the process checklists of companies interested in the solution.

These checklists were incredibly lengthy, detailing numerous tasks that were low in complexity and high in frequency. This substantial investment of time in routine activities was not only inefficient but also prevented HR professionals from dedicating time to more strategic and impactful aspects of their roles.

The pain points

By analyzing the checklists and interviewing HR managers, three clear pain points about the current situation were identified:

Error-prone

Manual check-list is reliant on human memory

Manual check-list is reliant on human memory

Resource intensive

One person becomes overloaded if they need to handle multiple checklists at the same time

One person becomes overloaded if they need to handle multiple checklists at the same time

HR people are drowning in busywork

HR specialists didn't feel like they were doing what they should be because of the clustered work and their focus on simple and repetitive tasks

HR specialists didn't feel like they were doing what they should be because of the clustered work and their focus on simple and repetitive tasks

Identifying the scope for the MVP

When mapping the problem it was clear that MVP won't entirely solve the HR managers' pains, as it still required substantial manual work to start the workflow and fill in all the necessary information. However, this was fine because we were measuring the time and effort saved after the process started.

Orchestrating all the communications and scheduling orientation meetings were one of the biggest frustrations for HR managers.

Enroll employee manually

Start workflow manually

Personalised email messages

Assisted calendar scheduling

MVP flow

Employee data from HRIS

Start workflow automatically

All repetitive tasks

Manage enrolled employees

Desired flow

User persona

HR managers or specialists who are well-versed in the processes but may lack technical expertise. The UI should highlight the primary use cases to avoid cluttered screens filled with configurations and advanced settings.

Two values we decided to stick with it when building the product:

  1. It should be simple to use

  2. It should not compromise the quality of the HR process

Prototyping v1

Managing communications via Gmail and scheduling Google Calendar meetings automatically were the only types of steps covered in the very first version. Adding more step types wouldn't make a big difference at this stage. However, it would significantly extend the shipping schedule due to the required integrations.

Building v1 workflow and manual start

Building v1 workflow and manual start

Improving the overall experience

Our goal was to provide an automated process after a manual start, aiming to attract more pilot users. We gradually added more step types based on 'must-have' feedback from our pilot customers, and also improved the editor's layout to support different sequences beyond just steps related to a single target date.

Multiple sequences and step types

Multiple sequences and step types

Empowering the HRIS integration

Building a tool to create custom HRIS triggers for customers was a necessary homestretch for this project, allowing them to create their own triggers that start workflows automatically once certain rules are met in the integrated HRIS.

Creating HRIS trigger

Creating HRIS trigger

Mapping HRIS fields

Mapping HRIS fields

Outcome

100k+

100k+

100k+

Tasks automated

77%

77%

77%

Sean Ellis score

+3

+3

+3

New use cases / Customer

Sean Ellis score

How disappointed would you be if you could no longer use this product?

  • Not disappointed (it isn’t really useful)

  • Somewhat disappointed (but I could find a substitute)

  • Very disappointed (I would not be able to find a suitable substitute)


(Number of users who answer "Very disappointed" / Total number of respondents) * 100

Sean Ellis score

How disappointed would you be if you could no longer use this product?

  • Not disappointed (it isn’t really useful)

  • Somewhat disappointed (but I could find a substitute)

  • Very disappointed (I would not be able to find a suitable substitute)


(Number of users who answer "Very disappointed" / Total number of respondents) * 100